Conclusion and observational vs Historical Science
Genesis Apologetics Ministry
•
04-Dec-2020
Natural History Museums create the impression that scientists from every field unanimously support the idea that evolution over millions of years explains all life on earth. But is this idea based on real, testable science? the same type of scientific method used today for putting people on the moon and advancing medical breakthroughs? We can't go back into the distant past to test evolution theory and the evidence for a recent creation and global flood is much stronger. Historical science requires inference and guesswork and observational science requires observation, testing, and repetition, which cannot be done on evolution.
Up Next in Genesis Apologetics Ministry
-
Deep Time and Radiometric Dating
Natural history museums are steeped in deep time. Everywhere you looksometimes on each wall of a museumthe idea of millions of years and evolution combine to explain the origin of all life on Earth. Are these ages reliable, or does the Bible present a history that better fits the data?
-
Dinosaur Extinction: Noah's Flood or ...
Natural History Museums attribute the dinosaur extinction to the Chicxulub asteroid hitting the Yucat‚àön peninsula of Mexico 66 million years ago. How can this single event explain the simultaneous extinction of all dinosaurs around the world, including a massive dinosaur kill zone in North Ame...
-
The Fossil Record and Transitional Forms
Natural history museums have some of the most amazing fossil collections in the world. These fossils are typically used to frame the idea of life slowly progressing over millions of years, rather than a worldwide catastrophe being the best explanation for the majority of the fossil record.
Are t...
1 Comment