For many people, the story of evolution removes God from the equation of life, concluding if there is a naturalistic, scientific way to account for the universe and everything in it, then God’s law is irrelevant. However, if we are simply evolved animals, how does morality apply at all? If “Thou shalt not kill” applies to humans, the question now becomes, “How human?” Social Darwinism, consistently applied, has been detrimental to society on many levels. If certain people groups are more advanced than others, and God’s moral law need not apply, under what logical premise can evolutionists argue for or against absolute morality?