Conclusion and observational vs Historical Science
Videos You May Have Missed
•
04-Dec-2020
Natural History Museums create the impression that scientists from every field unanimously support the idea that evolution over millions of years explains all life on earth. But is this idea based on real, testable science? the same type of scientific method used today for putting people on the moon and advancing medical breakthroughs? We can't go back into the distant past to test evolution theory and the evidence for a recent creation and global flood is much stronger. Historical science requires inference and guesswork and observational science requires observation, testing, and repetition, which cannot be done on evolution.
Up Next in Videos You May Have Missed
-
Practical Faith; 1 Thessalonians 4-5
"Faith in action is very real. Likewise, faith without action in your life is no faith at all. When we put our trust in God, following what He says because He's the one who said it, we will witness real tangible change in our lives. Paul writes to the new converts in Thessalonica, ""For this is t...
-
Answers News for Friday, September 5,...
Evolutionists recently changed their narrative in a major way. In this episode of Answers News, our hosts, Bryan Osborne, Avery Foley, and Dr. Georgia Purdom, share their perspectives on this topic as Bible-believing Christians.
-
الكتاب المقدس وتاريخ الديناصورات جزء ...
1 Comment